Food Footprints: Subjective Consumer Perception vs. Profound LCA Data

Written by Moritz Bühner   // November 1, 2011    5 Comments

4589897285_01a6f84d72_b

Today is World Vegan Day. Vegans are people ethically very consequent. Even more consequent than vegetarians. Vegans don’t eat products that derive from living beings – no cheese, no milk, no honey. Personally, i have a lot of respect for vegans, since they act by conviction. A vegan stands by what he or she believes in, since the vast majority of animal related food production fail to comply with ethically responsible conditions. Large scale factory farming and animal transport over large distances are not in keeping with the promise of the picturesque rustic agriculture of our grand mother’s generation. Following the official image given by supermarket publicity and food packages, small scale agriculture and happy farmer’s families produce our food, along with happy animals. Nothing could be further from reality.

Image of Food – Far From Reality

On the other hand, consumers, especially those who concern themselves ethically responsible, eco-friendly or environmentally aware, have a clear picture in mind when choosing the “right” product. Bearing in mind the environmental and ethical impact of the stuff we buy, is essential for a sustainable future. Granted. This subjective picture, however, often substantially differs from the detailed life cycle assessments (LCAs) scientists and consultants calculate. As a consequence, we can summarize that both the “official” image of food, transported by the food industry, and the consumer’s subjective image of food, fail to reflect the real state of affairs.

Organic Tomatoes or Canned Beans?

Because it is vegan day, the focus of today’s article lies on vegetables. This is the matter scientists from ETH Zürich investigated. How Do Consumers Assess the Environmental Friendliness of Vegetables? The Swiss researchers assayed the difference between consumer’s perception of environmental friendliness on the one hand and professional LCAs on the other. The study reveals:

In contrast to the LCA, consumers consider transportation distance rather than transportation mode and perceive organic production as very relevant for the environmental friendliness. Furthermore, consumers assess the environmental impact of packaging and conservation as more important than the LCA results show.

So instead of looking at how far the products have been transported, we should consider how they have been transported and correlate this information with the total distance. But is this really our personal responsibility as a consumer? Will it take us ages to go shopping because we calculate the complex environmental impact for every single product on our smart phone? Will we need to limit our consumption to the little amount of products that have a professional LCA already?

No. Instead, the authors of the study call for a standardized environmental product declaration:

Findings also suggest the current product information for vegetables is insufficient for judging their environmental friendliness. Implications for information campaigns and ecological food labeling are discussed.

A document from the European Comission (PDF), talking about the above mentioned study, proposes information campaigns as a mean to bridge the gap from the current situation to the moment, when legislation on product labelling will be reality:

There are environmental benefits to consuming seasonal and domestic vegetables and avoiding air transportation, heated greenhouse production and refrigeration, which could be highlighted in information campaigns.

Furthermore, the comission declares why voluntary environmental product declarations also make sense:

In addition, educational information with criteria, such as the environmental harm from air transportation and greenhouse production methods, could also help consumers avoid such products. These measures should also be implemented for organic products, which consumers already tend to view as eco-friendly.

Inspiration for Good Eating

If you feel overcharged with morality, and going vegan is out of question, you can still do your bit. Voilà some inspiration:

  • Ask your supermarket staff when carbon footprints or Life Cycle Analysis data of their products will be available. Keep asking from time to time.
  • Eat in a vegan restaurant
  • Don’t buy cheap meat. Research organic butchers in your area – you won’t spend more, if you buy meat less often
  • Eating less meat is easy, with delicious recipes and cooking ideas from weekday vegetarian blog
  • Comment this article with your favorite idea!

Further information:

PDF brochures on Vegan Day by Vegan Society

Article image CC 2.0 BY ND by foodswings.


About Moritz Bühner :

Job: Freelance blogger, attitude: green, reason: by conviction. Bachelor in Environmental and Bioresource Management at the University of Applied Life Sciences Vienna. Born in Hamburg, Germany, lived in Quebec (CAN), Vienna (AUT) and Pamplona (ESP). Why he blogs? "The possibility of going into detail with every link, satisfying the desire to learn. The direct feedback. The free global distribution. I just love the medium!"

Tags:

agriculture

environmental product declaration

food footprint

food industry

LCA

product carbon footprint

world vegan day



5 COMMENTS

  1. By Carlos Naranjo, November 3, 2011

    In Colombia, livestock contributes a significant impact on ecological footprint and carbon footprint, according to national studies.

    I am a vegetarian for a year and a half and I think it’s a way to reduce my impact :)

    Reply
  2. By Martina Prox, November 9, 2011

    I used to eat strictly vegetarian – not vegan – for about 10 years and I still enjoy vegetarian food very much. Why I gave up on eating strictly vegetarian? I found it a too big trade off when travelling, missing an important point of experiencing different cultures, showing respect to my hosts, valueing what they offered to me. Food has such an importance from a cultural perspective, that I did not like my attitude of always saying: “Sorry, I don’t eat this and that…” So in such situations I value the cultural experience and the respect for the effort taken by the hosts higher than reduction of my personal carbon footprint.

    Certainly there are many cultures with a wonderful variety of vegan and vegetarian food choices, such as indian, and many asian countries which do not get you into trouble wiht your environmental conciousness and the preference for a complete cultural experience.

    Reply
    • By Luvlucyblue, December 21, 2011

      In my view this is the same as saying “I’m against prostitution and drugs, but I went to Amsterdam and it was part of the culture to hire a hooker and smoke some weed so I had to experience it”

      I think you have a choice there and if your a vegetarian on animal rights principals then you should stand by your principals, just because your in another culture doesn’t mean you have to go along with their culture if that is against your principals.

      Animals on the other side of the world have just as muh feeling and just as much right to their own life as those in your back yard.

      Reply
      • By Moritz Buehner, December 29, 2011

        Well, I would say there is a need to differentiate here. What “we” as Westerners know as meat production, deals with factory farming in an industrial scale in a large extent, I would consider it 99,9%. On the other hand, there still is a small scale agriculture. This is what we find more often in most of the “developing world”. Self-sufficient farming, to meet the farmer’s family’s needs.
        Personally, I allow myself to eat meat from time to time, when I know where it comes from. A chick that freely ran around the house of a farmer all its life doesn’t compare with a battery farm existence, if you know what I mean…
        So I’m with Martina – I can stand by my principles and participate in a foreign culture at the same time.

        Reply
  3. By A Genest, June 15, 2012

    I often get the impression that people tend to say ” I’m vegetarien so I have a low impact on the environment or on the ecological footprint”. However, in my opinion it’s much more about the things we eat in general. If we take care where our foot comes from and how it’sbeen produced, it helps much more than just to avoid certain products. Of course, not eating meat and taking care about what we eat might be the best. What I want to say is that a vegetarien eating tropical fruits, soya products…. is not better than a person eating rarely the chicken that runs around the house and just consumes seasonal and regional foot.
    I think it’s not possible to encourage people to reduce their impacts to the environment by saying you can’t do this and that.
    It’s much easier and maybe more effective to tell people that they don’t need to change the whole diet but to pay attention that you take the best out of a certain variety. For example: If you live in Germany and it’s summer, please take the strawberries from the next field and not the strawberries that are imported from southern Europe.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar posts

20-20-20 Objectives

2012

3 scopes

3D printing

academia

ACHEMA

acidification

agriculture

air quality

aluminum

Ankara

antarctic ozone hole

apocalypse

assessment

atmospheric carbon measurement

B2B

Bachelor program

background database

BASF

battery change station

best practice

bio capacity

bio-economy

biocapacity

biodiversity

biological gas treatment

biomass

blogs

BMBF

books

Brazil

BREEAM

building sector

building standards

business opportunity

carbon

carbon accouting

carbon assessment

carbon emissions

carbon footprint

carbon footprinting

carbon free city

carbon intensity

carbon leakage

carbon management

carbon neutral

carbon neutrality

carbon reduction

carbon relocation

carbon tax

carbon-neutral travel

cargo shipping

carton

central america

central asia

certification

CFC

change

chemical industry

China

circular economy

circular flow economy

city

climate change

climate control

climate impact

climate neutral

climate protection

club of rome

co2-equivalent

cogeneration

collaborative consumption

combined reporting

commercial sector

commons

comparative life cycle assessment

Competence Center

composite indicator

compost

composting

consistency

construction

construction industry

consumption

container ship

copenhagen

corporate carbon footprint

corporate culture

corporate material flow modeling

Corporate Social Responsibility

cost accounting

cost-effective measures

Country Attractiveness

cradle to cradle

creative destruction

Creative Sustainability

Critique of the Green Economy

cross-collaboration

CSR

CSR report

customer-driven sustainability

cycling

dairy

Dashboard of Sustainability

database

Davos

de-growth economy

decarbonization

dematerialization

denmark

design

developing countries

developing world

development cooperation

distributed manufacturing

divestment

domestic fuel consumption

domestic sector

double decoupling

e!Sankey

e-car

e-mobility

e-sankey

earth overshoot day

Earth Sciences

Earth summit

eCarUs

eco city

eco design

eco label

ecodesign

ecoinvent

ecologic footprint

ecological footprint

ecological resilience

ecological tax reform

economic indicators

ecosystem disturbance

ecovillage

education

efficiency

efficiency factory

efficiency investment

efficiency measures

efficient construction

Effizienzfabrik

EHS

eLCAr

electric car

emerging economies

emission gap

emission relocation

emissions

EMS

energiewende

energy

energy contracting

energy efficiency

Energy Efficiency Directive

energy efficiency in production

energy efficient production

Energy Intensity by Sector

energy management

energy performance

energy reduction

energy sources

energy transition

engineering excellence

Enhipro

enms

environment

Environment Ministry

environmental accounting

environmental awareness

environmental capital

Environmental Contracting

environmental control

environmental cost accounting

Environmental Engineering

Environmental Goods and Services Sector

Environmental Governance

environmental impact

environmental labeling

environmental management

environmental management system

environmental performance

environmental performance indicator

environmental policy

environmental product declaration

environmental product declarations

environmental profit and loss statement

environmental regulation

environmental standard

Environmental Sustainability Index

environmental technology verification

Environmentally Harmful Subsidy

Environmentally Weighed Material Consumption

EPD

EU

Europe

European Comission

european commission

European Green Cars Initiative

European Sustainable Development Strategy

eutrophication

EVALEAU

events

external effects

fashion

FIFA

fish

fishery

food footprint

food industry

food production

food sector

footprinting

forest ecosystems

forestry

fouling

FPC

free trade

freighter travel

full cost accounting

gate-to-gate

gate-to-gate approach

geopolymer cement

Germany

Ghana

GHG emissions

GHG mitigation

GHG reduction

GHG reduction goals

glass

Global Compact

global justice

global warming

governance

green building

green buildings

green business

green business models

green Christmas

green construction

green consumers

green economy

green growth

green investment

green jobs

green living

green new deal

green paradox

green production

greenhouse gas emissions

greenhouse gas inventory

greenhouse gas protocol

greenhouse gas reduction

greenhouse gases

greenwash

GRI

handprinting

Happy Life Years

harmonization

HDPE

Herman Daly

HFC

holistic approach

holistic sustainability

human development index

HVAC

IEA

IFEU

ifu hamburg

ILCD Handbook

impact assessment

impact category

incentive

Incentive-based pay

incineration

India

industrial ecology

industrial location choice

industrial production

industrial sector

information design

innovation

input output

input-output databases

input-output economics

InReff

insulation

Integrated Reporting

integrative approach

intellectual property

internalization of externalities

international standards

interplant collaboration

IPCC

ISO

ISO 14000

ISO 14001

ISO 14015

ISO 14025

ISO 14031

ISO 14040

ISO 14046

ISO 14051

ISO 14064

ISO 14067

ISO 50001

Jevon’s Paradox.

knowledge economy

Kuznets curve

Kyoto protocol

LCA

LCA recommendations

LCA software

LCM Berlin

lean manufacturing

LEED

life cycle

life cycle analysis

life cycle assessment

life cycle engineering

life cycle inventory

life cycle management

life cycle thinking

life style

lifecycle

limits to growth

LinkedIn

living planet report

Long-Term Pay

low carbon economy

low-carbon transport

low-energy house

management models

manufacturing industry

masdar city

master program

material consumption

material efficiency

material flow

material flow accounting

Material Flow Accounts

material flow analysis

material flow balance

material flow cost accounting

material flow cost analysis

Material Flow Management

material flow modeling

material flowcosts

material flows

material footprint

meat

mechanical-biological treatment

media

metal industry

methodology

Mexico

MFA

MFCA

milk

modeling

Montreal Protocol

municipal solid waste

nature conservation

Nepal

NIMBY

nitrate pollution

nuclear phase out

nutrients balance

nutrients cycle

OECD

OECD Environment Policy Committee

oligolopoly

Online Resource Efficiency Platform OREP

operational efficiency

organic agriculture

outsourcing

ozone layer recovery

packaging

PAS

passive house

patents

PET

philippines

phosphorus

photovoltaics

pilot program

pinch analysis

plastic industry

policy

policy instruments

politics

pollution haven hypothesis

post growth economy

post oil age

PR

process engineering

process heat

process improvement

process modeling

Process Optimization

process system engineering

product carbon footprint

product environmental footprint

product stewardship

production

production circle

production planning

production system

Production-based CO2 Productivity

productivity

PUMA

PVC

qatar

quality

quality journalism

quantified self

Rapid prototyping

rebound effect

recycling

refuse-derived fuel plant

remuneration

remuneration of environmental performance

renewable energy

renewable energy in manufacturing

renewable heat

renewable hydrogen

renewable methane

renewable process heat

renewable raw material

Renewable Resources

renewable thermal energy

resilience

resource conflicts

resource efficiency

Resource Efficiency Framework

resource flows

resource politics

resource productivity

resources

retailer

reuse

RFID

Rio+20 summit

rising material demand

risk management

Rolf Dobelli

sankey diagram

saving potentials

savings

scope 3

seafood

season's greetings

seattle

shopping rage

smart grid

smart meter

SMB

social cost accounting

social media

social metabolism

Social-Ecological Resilience

software

solar energy

solar heat

solar thermal energy

South Africa

South America

South Korea

soy milk

stakeholder management

standards

statistics

steady state economy

steel

stranded assets

strong sustainability

studies

sufficiency

supermarket chain

sustainability

sustainability control

sustainability indicators

sustainability innovation

sustainability management

sustainability performance

sustainability projects

sustainability reporting

Sustainability Science

sustainability strategy

sustainability triangle

sustainable agriculture

sustainable architecture

sustainable business

sustainable construction

sustainable development

sustainable housing

sustainable lifestyle

Sustainable Living

Sustainable Process Index

Sustainable Resource Management

sustainable transport

sydney

system analysis

tajikistan

Tesco

textile industry

textile refinement

Tobias Viere

total material consumption

trade

transparency

transport

transport emissions

transport sector

trends

triple bottom line principles

Turkey

Umberto

umberto for carbon footprint

umberto user workshop

Umweltbundesamt

university

upcycling

urban carbon emissions

VDMA

vernon curve

vertical cooperation

Vertragsnaturschutz

virtual water

waste air treatment

waste cycle

waste disposal

waste hierarchy

waste management

waste prevention

wastewater

wastewater treatment

water abstraction rate

Water Consumption by Sector

water extraction

water filter

water footprint

Water Management

water stress

web 2.0

Wellbeing Index

wind gas

wind power

wine

with both eyes open

working conditions

world cup

world statistics day

world vegan day

YET

zero carbon

zero carbon city

zero emission mobility

zero growth

zero growth economy