Why the Carbon Tax Makes Sense and How to Gain a Competitive Edge From it

Written by Moritz Bühner   // January 21, 2012    3 Comments

ktf_carbontax

Instead of hoping that your lobbyist negotiates another carbon tax exemption for your industry, you could be preparing your business for the low-carbon era. A decisive competitive edge can be expected for those businesses that begin managing and thus professionally reducing their carbon emissions now, rather than maintaining outdated oil age thinking – read how to do this here. Furthermore, get an introduction to the carbon tax, how high we can expect it to go, and why you should invest in green technology.

In order to reward companies that employ low carbon technology, the carbon tax is inevitable. From an environmental point of view, it is more than obvious that its introduction makes sense. The US-based Carbon Tax Center identifies some reasons:

Very large and rapid reductions in the United States’ and other nations’ carbon emissions are essential to avoid runaway climate change and avert the resulting severe weather events, inundation of coastal areas, spread of diseases, failure of agriculture and water supplies, infrastructure destruction, forced migrations, political upheavals and international conflicts.

Adding to this, there are many economists, who have declared themselves to be in favor of it. One of them is William Nordhaus from Yale University. In his paper, Carbon Taxes to Move Toward Fiscal Sustainability, he states:

[The carbon tax] is virtually the only tax under consideration that will increase economic efficiency because it reduces the output of an undesirable activity (carbon dioxide emissions).
Every other tax that is under discussion will reduce economic efficiency.

Carbon Tax Yes, But How High?

Even though most expect the carbon tax to come, and there is a whole list of countries that are close to introducing it in one form or another, there is still wide disagreement on the amount of the tax. Nordhaus put it like this:

Depending on the model and the objective, the optimal global carbon tax in current prices in 2015 would be between $12 and $25 per ton of carbon dioxide. The appropriate tax should rise about 6 percent per year in real or inflation-corrected terms to reflect the increasing cost of future emissions.

Avoiding the Green Paradox

Detailed studies have been conducted on how these expectations affect the willingness of decision makers to increase green investments, e.g. by Michael Hoel at the University of Oslo. Mentioning all his findings would be excessive, but an article dealing with carbon taxation cannot do without mentioning the green paradox. The green paradox (introduced by Hans-Werner Sinn), as Ottmar Edenhofer and Matthias Kalkuhl described it, is the phenomenon of “fast increasing carbon taxes [accelerating] global warming”. How is that possible? Well, “if [the carbon taxes] start at a low level (…), resource owners increase near-term extraction in fear of higher future taxation.” According to Edenhofer and Kalkuhl, avoiding this effect can easily be achieved by adjusting the tax properly.

60% of Sustainable Investments Pay Back in Three Years or Less

However, this is not today’s topic. Much rather, I would like to give you an insight into what professional carbon management looks like. Kathy Nieland, responsible for Sustainable Business Solutions at PricewaterhouseCoopers, reckons that “proactive steps to sustain one’s business over time will ultimately yield positive returns” and specified that “over 60 percent of projects [offer] payback in three years or less”. In her article, How Companies Gain Strategic Advantage by Managing Carbon, she also explains why activity moving toward a sustainable economy and economic growth correlate positively.

Not Enough: Carbon “Management” in a Spreadsheet

You may think that assessing emissions in a spreadsheet would be enough. Paul Baier from GreenBiz.com clarifies why it’s not:

The major problems of spreadsheets include:
• Lack of proper documentation and audit trails
• Propensity for errors, especially without proper cell protection, and lack of validation and
testing of spreadsheet formulas and macros
• Difficulties in reconciling year-to-year data sets
• Poor tools for creating and enforcing data ownership, including global standards for asset
types and energy usage
• Inability to generate real-time reports and read-only views across the organization
• Difficulties in obtaining ad-hoc reports and analyses for numerous internal and external
stakeholders
• Difficulties in managing and sharing large files

Carbon Management in the Food Sector

To find out what professional carbon management tools are capable of, take a look at an article by Carlos Naranjo, a chemical engineer and carbon consultant in Colombia. At knowtheflow, he describes his findings in the food sector, employing the Umberto for Carbon Footprint carbon management tool. He determined that, “The largest share of carbon emissions is provided by direct emissions from the use of fuels in numerous processes inside the company.”

Standards – Managing Carbon Consistently and Transparent

A clear benefit of sophisticated carbon management is the possibility of complying with international standards. Alexander Scheibner, in this knowtheflow article, wrote in reference to the introduction of a new GHG protocol standard:

Standardized approaches [...] enable companies to prepare a true and fair scope 3 GHG inventory which offers the identification of cost-effective processes low in emissions.

Whether you are in favor of the carbon tax or not, I hope to have given you reasons enough to employ professional carbon management in your company.

Article image edited by Moritz Bühner, based on this picture by Phil Roeder and the amazing WP ZOOM developer icon set.


Tags:

carbon management

carbon tax

corporate carbon footprint

green paradox

post oil age

sustainability



Similar posts

20-20-20 Objectives

2012

3 scopes

agriculture

air quality

Ankara

apocalypse

assessment

B2B

Bachelor program

background database

BASF

battery change station

bio capacity

biodiversity

biological gas treatment

biomass

carbon

carbon accouting

carbon assessment

carbon footprint

carbon footprinting

carbon free city

carbon leakage

carbon management

carbon neutral

carbon neutrality

carbon reduction

carbon relocation

carbon tax

central america

certification

change

circular flow economy

city

climate change

climate control

climate impact

climate neutral

climate protection

club of rome

co2-equivalent

Competence Center

consistency

construction

consumption

copenhagen

corporate carbon footprint

corporate culture

cost accounting

Country Attractiveness

cradle to cradle

cross-collaboration

CSR

customer-driven sustainability

cycling

database

de-growth economy

decarbonization

denmark

e!Sankey

e-car

e-sankey

earth overshoot day

eCarUs

eco city

eco label

ecodesign

ecoinvent

ecological footprint

ecovillage

education

efficiency

efficiency investment

efficiency measures

EHS

eLCAr

emissions

EMS

energy

energy efficiency

Energy Efficiency Directive

energy efficient production

energy management

energy performance

energy reduction

energy sources

engineering excellence

Enhipro

enms

environment

Environment Ministry

environmental awareness

environmental capital

Environmental Contracting

environmental cost accounting

environmental impact

environmental labeling

environmental management

environmental management system

environmental performance

environmental performance indicator

environmental product declaration

environmental profit and loss statement

environmental standard

Environmentally Harmful Subsidy

EPD

EU

European Comission

european commission

European Sustainable Development Strategy

EVALEAU

events

external effects

fishery

food footprint

food industry

food sector

forest ecosystems

forestry

full cost accounting

Germany

GHG reduction

global justice

global warming

green Christmas

green consumers

green economy

green investment

green jobs

green paradox

green production

greenhouse gas emissions

greenhouse gas inventory

greenhouse gas protocol

greenhouse gas reduction

greenhouse gases

IFEU

impact assessment

incentive

Incentive-based pay

industrial ecology

industrial production

innovation

input output

input-output databases

input-output economics

integrative approach

internalization of externalities

international standards

ISO

ISO 14000

ISO 14001

ISO 14015

ISO 14025

ISO 14031

ISO 14040

ISO 14064

ISO 14067

ISO 50001

LCA

LCM Berlin

lean manufacturing

life cycle

life cycle analysis

life cycle assessment

life cycle management

life style

lifecycle

limits to growth

Long-Term Pay

low carbon economy

management models

masdar city

material flow accounting

Material Flow Accounts

material flow analysis

material flow balance

material flow modeling

material flowcosts

material flows

methodology

MFA

nature conservation

OECD

OECD Environment Policy Committee

oligolopoly

organic agriculture

PAS

philippines

pinch analysis

plastic industry

policy

post growth economy

post oil age

process improvement

process modeling

Process Optimization

process system engineering

product carbon footprint

production

production circle

production planning

production system

productivity

PUMA

quality

recycling

remuneration

remuneration of environmental performance

renewable energy

resource efficiency

Resource Efficiency Framework

resource productivity

resources

retailer

savings

scope 3

seattle

shopping rage

smart grid

smart meter

SMB

social cost accounting

social media

software

statistics

steady state economy

strong sustainability

studies

sufficiency

supermarket chain

sustainability

sustainability innovation

sustainability management

sustainability projects

sustainability strategy

sustainable development

sustainable lifestyle

Sustainable Living

sustainable transport

sydney

system analysis

Tesco

Tobias Viere

transparency

transport

transport sector

trends

Turkey

Umberto

umberto for carbon footprint

umberto user workshop

vernon curve

Vertragsnaturschutz

virtual water

waste air treatment

waste cycle

waste disposal

waste hierarchy

waste management

waste prevention

water footprint

wine

working conditions

world statistics day

world vegan day

zero carbon city

zero emission mobility

zero growth economy